Searches , social queries for CONCURRENCE
Search references for CONCURRENCE. Phrases containing CONCURRENCE
See searches and references containing CONCURRENCE!
Search references for CONCURRENCE. Phrases containing CONCURRENCE
See searches and references containing CONCURRENCE!CONCURRENCE
Simultaneity of actus reus and mens rea
In Western jurisprudence, concurrence (also contemporaneity or simultaneity) is the apparent need to prove the simultaneous occurrence of both actus reus
Concurrence
State invariant involving qubits
In quantum information science, the concurrence is a state invariant involving qubits. The concurrence is an entanglement monotone (a way of measuring
Concurrence (quantum computing)
Concurrence_(quantum_computing)
Topics referred to by the same term
concurrent, or concurrence in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Concurrent means happening at the same time. Concurrency, concurrent, or concurrence may refer
Concurrency
October 2024 to October 2025 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Filed a statement
2024 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2024_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Physics of the cause–effect relation
In physics, causality requires the cause of an event to be in the past light cone of the result and to be ultimately reducible to fundamental interactions
Causality_(physics)
1977 United States Supreme Court case
compelling state interest-curtailing illegal drug use. Stewart qualified his concurrence by indicating he agreed with the majority's decision but that he agreed
Whalen_v._Roe
October 2025 to October 2026 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Filed a statement
2025 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2025_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Legal term
Meeting of the minds (also referred to as mutual agreement, mutual assent, or consensus ad idem) is a phrase in contract law used to describe the intentions
Meeting_of_the_minds
1952 United States Supreme Court case
concurred, joined by Associate Justice William O. Douglas. Frankfurter's concurrence provided a ringing defense of the special role teachers play in a democracy:
Wieman_v._Updegraff
Competition regulator in France
The Autorité de la concurrence (French for 'Competition Authority'; French: [ɔtɔʁite də la kɔ̃kyʁɑ̃s]) is France's national competition regulator. Its
Autorité_de_la_concurrence
Highest court of jurisdiction in the U.S.
A justice may write an opinion in concurrence with the court, or they may write a dissent, and these concurrences or dissents may also be joined by other
Supreme Court of the United States
Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1981 United States Supreme Court case
P. Stevens Case opinions Majority Rehnquist, Burger, Stewart, Blackmun, Powell Concurrence Brennan Concurrence White Dissent Marshall Dissent Stevens
Postal Service v. Council of Greenburgh Civic Ass'ns
Postal_Service_v._Council_of_Greenburgh_Civic_Ass'ns
Term for US law enforcement practice
contextual indicators. The term is associated with Justice Brett Kavanaugh's concurrence in Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo (2025), in which he stated that although apparent
Kavanaugh_stop
2014 United States Supreme Court case
Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan Concurrence Ginsburg, joined by Breyer, Sotomayor Concurrence Thomas (in judgment), joined by Scalia, Alito
Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc.
Halliburton_Co._v._Erica_P._John_Fund,_Inc.
October 2021 to October 2022 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Filed a statement
2021 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2021_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1946 United States Supreme Court case
the true importance behind a free press and Bridges v. California. His concurrence can be summarized as follows, "The precise issue is whether, and to what
Pennekamp_v._Florida
2023 United States Supreme Court case
opinions Majority Kavanaugh, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Barrett Concurrence Thomas Dissent Gorsuch, joined by Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson Laws applied
Arizona_v._Navajo_Nation
October 2023 to October 2024 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Filed a statement
2023 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2023_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
English criminal law case
Police Commissioner (1968) is a leading case that confirms the need for concurrence (or coincidence) of actus reus (Latin for "guilty act") and mens rea
Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
Fagan_v_Metropolitan_Police_Commissioner
1990 United States Supreme Court case
White, Blackmun, Stevens Concurrence Marshall (part III-A), joined by Rehnquist, White, Blackmun Concurrence Brennan Concurrence Stevens Dissent Kennedy
Chauffeurs, Teamsters, & Helpers Local No. 391 v. Terry
Chauffeurs,_Teamsters,_&_Helpers_Local_No._391_v._Terry
2001 United States Supreme Court case
act in question was entirely 'civil'. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a concurrence in the decision of the majority with which Justice Souter joined. He
Seling_v._Young
October 2018 to October 2019 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Did not participate
2018 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2018_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1981 United States Supreme Court case
Commerce Clause case law. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote a separate concurrence reiterating that Congress can only regulate activities with a substantial
Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining and Reclamation Association
Hodel_v._Virginia_Surface_Mining_and_Reclamation_Association
Former law granting autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir
Central Government would be applied to Jammu and Kashmir only with the concurrence of the State's own constituent assembly. This was a "temporary provision"
Article 370 of the Constitution of India
Article_370_of_the_Constitution_of_India
1950 Supreme Court of Canada case
Cartwright, Gerald Fauteux Reasons given Majority Cartwright J., joined by Rinfret C.J., Taschereau, Rand, Kellock, and Locke JJ. Concurrence Kerwin J.
Frey_v_Fedoruk
October 2016 to October 2017 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Did not participate
2016 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2016_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
October 2019 to October 2020 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Filed a statement
2019 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2019_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
October 2020 to October 2021 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Filed a statement
2020 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2020_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
2026 film by Lena Khan
competitive team at UCLA and previous winners of Best of the Best. In concurrence with the film, the New York Times followed UCLA Nashaa during their 2025-2026
Best_of_the_Best_(2026_film)
October 2012 to October 2013 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Did not participate
2012 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2012_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
2024 United States Supreme Court case
opinions Majority Barrett, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh Concurrence Gorsuch (in judgment) Dissent Sotomayor, joined by Kagan, Jackson Laws
Department_of_State_v._Muñoz
Tractate of the Talmud
presumption of innocence and the rule that a criminal conviction requires the concurrence of twelve. Within Seder Nezikin, the Sanhedrin focuses on questions of
Sanhedrin_(tractate)
2010 United States Supreme Court case
commanded a majority of the Court as to all parts. Justice Stevens' concurrence, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor, argues that the
Bilski_v._Kappos
1960 United States Supreme Court case
English Wikisource has original text related to this article: Commissioner Of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein Commissioner v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278 (1960)
Commissioner_v._Duberstein
National award in Philippines
trustees of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund based in New York City with the concurrence of the Philippine government. It is often called the "Nobel Prize of
Ramon_Magsaysay_Award
Competition, Consumption & Repression of Frauds (Direction générale de la concurrence, de la consommation et de la répression des fraudes (DGCCRF)) regulates
Politics_of_France
2024 United States Supreme Court case
Majority Thomas, joined by Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett Concurrence Alito Dissent Sotomayor, joined by Kagan, Jackson Laws applied National
Garland_v._Cargill
Concurrence of events with no connection
A coincidence is a remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances that have no apparent causal connection with one another. The perception of remarkable
Coincidence
1949 United States Supreme Court case
of contracts that would bring it about. Justice Frankfurter wrote his concurrence on a single point, joining the court on all others. His main point was
Lincoln Union v. Northwestern Co.
Lincoln_Union_v._Northwestern_Co.
1978 United States Supreme Court case
separate one as well. Justices Stewart and Powell each wrote their own concurrence agreeing with the judgment of the court. Chief Justice Burger joined
Zablocki_v._Redhail
2023 United States Supreme Court case
Ketanji Brown Jackson Case opinions Majority Alito, joined by unanimous Concurrence Sotomayor, joined by Jackson Laws applied Title VII of the Civil Rights
Groff_v._DeJoy
1948 United States Supreme Court case
joined by Black, Frankfurter, Douglas, Murphy, Rutledge Concurrence Black, joined by Douglas Concurrence Murphy, joined by Rutledge Dissent Reed, joined by
Oyama_v._California
1990 United States Supreme Court case
of personal jurisdiction. Justice Scalia criticized Justice Brennan's concurrence as advocating for vague standards and using circular logic. Scalia dislikes
Burnham v. Superior Court of California
Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California
US Court of Appeals decision
protesting. Court membership Judges sitting Farris, Boochever and Fernandez Case opinions Majority Boochever (opinion), joined by Farris Concurrence Fernandez
United_States_v._Schoon
Supreme Court of Canada case
Majority Moldaver, Karakatsanis and Brown JJ., joined by Abella and Côté JJ. Concurrence Cromwell J., joined by McLachlin C.J. and Wagner and Gascon JJ.
R_v_Jordan_(2016)
1951 United States Supreme Court case
uncomfortable joining the majority and led him to complete an uncirculated draft concurrence in which he attacked Douglas's criticism of the government because it
Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath
Joint_Anti-Fascist_Refugee_Committee_v._McGrath
1978 United States Supreme Court case
Stewart, joined by Burger, White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens Concurrence Marshall (in judgment), joined by Brennan Laws applied U.S. Const. amend
Califano_v._Aznavorian
1978 United States Supreme Court case
additional reason not relied upon by the plurality." In a separate special concurrence from Justice Blackmun, Justice Marshall noted his opposition of the death
Lockett_v._Ohio
1972 U.S. Supreme Court case
the evolving standards of decency of a contemporary society. In his concurrence Justice Brennan said jury-imposed death sentences were relatively few
Furman_v._Georgia
2020 United States Supreme Court case
Gorsuch, Kavanaugh; Thomas (Parts I, III, and IV) Concurrence Thomas (in part and in the judgment) Concurrence Alito (in part and in the judgment) Laws applied
Monasky_v._Taglieri
1980 United States Supreme Court case
Majority Marshall, joined by Burger, Brennan, White, Blackmun, Powell Concurrence Powell Dissent Stevens, joined by Stewart, Rehnquist Laws applied U.S
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker
White_Mountain_Apache_Tribe_v._Bracker
1944 U.S. Supreme Court case upholding the internment of Japanese Americans
Japanese American must be released from detention. Justice Frankfurter's concurrence reads: [W]ithin their sphere, military authorities are no more outside
Korematsu_v._United_States
term statistics (in progress) 3 Majority or plurality 0 Concurrence 0 Other 0 Dissent 0 Concurrence/dissent Total = 3 Bench opinions = 3 Opinions relating
2025 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts
2025_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_John_Roberts
1975 United States Supreme Court case
Majority Stewart, joined by Douglas, Brennan, Marshall, White Concurrence Marshall Concurrence Blackmun Concur/dissent Burger Laws applied Title VII of the
Albemarle_Paper_Co._v._Moody
2012 United States Supreme Court case
opinions Majority Thomas, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Alito, Kagan Concurrence Kagan Concur/dissent Sotomayor, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer Laws applied
Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp.
Kurns_v._Railroad_Friction_Products_Corp.
Image search enhancing tool
Google Image Swirl was an enhancement for an image-search tool in Google Labs. It was announced on the Google labs blog on November 17, 2009 with a limited
Google_Image_Swirl
1987 United States Supreme Court case
reversal and could never be deemed harmless error. (Justice Scalia's concurrence in the judgment provided the fifth vote to reverse, for different reasons
Young v. United States ex rel. Vuitton et Fils S.A.
Young_v._United_States_ex_rel._Vuitton_et_Fils_S.A.
2021 United States Supreme Court case
about the case Thomas' majority opinion Roberts' concurrence Alito's concurrence Kavanaugh's concurrence Text of Caniglia v. Strom, 593 U.S. 194 (2021)
Caniglia_v._Strom
1990 United States Supreme Court case
have misrepresented the Court's reasoning in Bertine. In Blackmun's concurrence, he agreed that a State could reasonably adopt a policy mandating the
Florida_v._Wells
1997 United States Supreme Court case
Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer Case opinions Majority Thomas, joined by unanimous Concurrence Ginsburg, joined by Kennedy Laws applied Patent Act of 1952
Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.
Warner-Jenkinson_Co._v._Hilton_Davis_Chemical_Co.
1967 United States Supreme Court case
certiorari. In Part I, not a part of the opinion because of the limited concurrence of Chief Justice Warren and Justice Douglas, Justice Brennan held that
United_States_v._Wade
1988 United States Supreme Court case
joined by Rehnquist, White, Scalia Concurrence Blackmun (in part and in judgment), joined by Brennan, Marshall Concurrence Stevens (in judgment) Kennedy took
Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust
Watson_v._Fort_Worth_Bank_&_Trust
2023 United States Supreme Court case
material for Warhol's Prince Series." Judge Dennis Jacobs added a short concurrence "to make a single point": that the court's decision was limited to the
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith
Andy_Warhol_Foundation_for_the_Visual_Arts,_Inc._v._Goldsmith
1971 United States Supreme Court case
Harlan, joined by Burger, Stewart, Marshall, White, Blackmun Concurrence Douglas Concurrence Brennan Dissent Black Laws applied U.S. Const. Amend. XIV
Boddie_v._Connecticut
Sotomayor 2024 term statistics 1 Majority or plurality 2 Concurrence 4 Other 0 Dissent 0 Concurrence/dissent Total = 7 Bench opinions = 3 Opinions relating
2024 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor
2024_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Sonia_Sotomayor
2013 landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court
defendants' right to remain silent during questioning and at trial. In his concurrence, Justice Thomas wrote that he would have gone further and held that,
Salinas_v._Texas
1977 United States Supreme Court case
Majority Powell, Jr., joined by Burger, Stewart, White, Rehnquist, Stevens Concurrence Burger Dissent Brennan, joined by Marshall, Blackmun Laws applied Title
Maher_v._Roe
2003 US Supreme Court gerrymandering case
Majority O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas Concurrence Kennedy Concurrence Thomas Dissent Souter, joined by Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer
Georgia_v._Ashcroft
Head of government in the Malaysian state of Negeri Sembilan
constitution, the Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan with the concurrence of Negeri Ruling Chiefs shall first appoint the Menteri Besar to preside
Menteri Besar of Negeri Sembilan
Menteri_Besar_of_Negeri_Sembilan
Supreme Court of Canada case
Majority McLachlin J., joined by L'Heureux‑Dubé and Gonthier JJ. Concurrence Lamer J. Concurrence La Forest J. Concur/dissent Wilson J. Concur/dissent Cory J
Mackeigan_v_Hickman
1992 United States Supreme Court case
Court vacated the sentence against Dawson and remanded the case. In his concurrence, Justice Blackmun agreed with the Court's opinion, but specifically noted
Dawson_v._Delaware
1967 United States Supreme Court case
Majority Black, joined by Warren, Douglas, Clark, Brennan, White, and Fortas Concurrence Stewart Dissent Harlan Laws applied U.S. Const. amends. V, XIV
Chapman_v._California
2026 United States Supreme Court case
opinions Majority Barrett, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh Concurrence Sotomayor (in judgment), joined by Kagan Dissent Jackson
Fernandez_v._United_States
2026 United States Supreme Court case
(parts I through IV–B) Plurality Jackson (part IV–C), joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan Concurrence Gorsuch Laws applied Blockburger v. United States
Barrett v. United States (2026)
Barrett_v._United_States_(2026)
Overruled U.S. Supreme Court case upholding anti-sodomy laws
Majority White, joined by Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor Concurrence Burger Concurrence Powell Dissent Blackmun, joined by Brennan, Marshall, Stevens
Bowers_v._Hardwick
2018 United States Supreme Court case
in taxes that they could not collect. Following a statement made in a concurrence opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy in a 2015 related case, which suggested
South_Dakota_v._Wayfair,_Inc.
1945 attacks in Japan during WWII
Union, at the upcoming Potsdam Conference, as this also required British concurrence. Orders for the attack were issued to General Carl Spaatz on 25 July
Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki
Interstate Highway in Texas
county line for designation as I-69, which was to be signed as I-69E upon concurrence from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). FHWA approval for this
Interstate_69_in_Texas
1873 United States Supreme Court case
Case opinions Majority Miller, joined by Clifford, Davis, Strong, Hunt Concurrence Bradley, joined by Swayne, Field Dissent Chase Laws applied U.S. Const
Bradwell_v._Illinois
Water sport competitions
The Italian swimming team did not participate in the event due to its concurrence with the Settecolli Trophy, chosen as a key event in preparation and
2024 European Aquatics Championships
2024_European_Aquatics_Championships
1975 United States Supreme Court case
Powell (Parts III, IV), joined by Burger, White, Blackmun, Rehnquist Concurrence Stewart, joined by Douglas, Brennan, Marshall Laws applied U.S. Const
Gerstein_v._Pugh
United States obscenity law expression
"obscenity", he did not use the word "obscenity" himself in his short concurrence, but stated that he knew what fit the "shorthand description" of "hard-core
I_know_it_when_I_see_it
2024 U.S. Supreme Court case on abortion
health consequences, including loss of fertility". In Justice Barrett's concurrence, joined by Roberts and Kavanaugh, she agreed that dismissing the case
Moyle_v._United_States
1970 United States Supreme Court case
Byron White Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun Case opinions Per curiam Concurrence Black Dissent Douglas Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision
Mitchell_v._Donovan
Generative AI chatbot by OpenAI
2024. Retrieved June 5, 2024. Weiss, Debra Cassens (June 6, 2024). "In concurrence confession, appeals judge says ChatGPT research 'less nutty' than feared"
ChatGPT
2025 United States Supreme Court case
position, Gorsuch cited Thomas' concurrence in the 2011 case Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership. The concurrence was seen as protesting the landmark
E.M.D._Sales,_Inc._v._Carrera
1976 U.S. Supreme Court case upholding the death penalty
Powell, Stevens Concurrence White (in judgment), joined by Burger, Rehnquist Concurrence Burger, Rehnquist (in judgment) Concurrence Blackmun (in judgment)
Gregg_v._Georgia
1990 United States Supreme Court case
opinions Plurality Stevens, joined by Brennan, Blackmun, and Kennedy Concurrence Marshall, joined by Brennan Dissent White Dissent O'Connor, joined by
Peel v. Attorney Disciplinary Commission of Illinois
Peel_v._Attorney_Disciplinary_Commission_of_Illinois
Most serious disciplinary action that can be taken against a Member
proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member." The process for expulsion from the House
Expulsion from the United States Congress
Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress
2025 US Supreme Court case
Brown Jackson Case opinions Majority Sotomayor, joined by unanimous Concurrence Alito, joined by Thomas and Kavanaugh Laws applied Employee Retirement
Cunningham v. Cornell University
Cunningham_v._Cornell_University
2025 United States Supreme Court case
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson Case opinions Per curiam Concurrence Alito Dissent Thomas, joined by Gorsuch
Andrew_v._White
1968 United States Supreme Court case
Majority Marshall, joined by Warren, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, Fortas Concurrence Douglas Dissent Black Dissent Harlan Dissent White Laws applied U.S.
Food Employees v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc.
Food_Employees_v._Logan_Valley_Plaza,_Inc.
Gorsuch 2019 term statistics 7 Majority or plurality 3 Concurrence 2 Other 3 Dissent 2 Concurrence/dissent Total = 17 Bench opinions = 13 Opinions relating
2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Neil Gorsuch
2019_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Neil_Gorsuch
1981 United States Supreme Court case
Marshall (all but part II-C) Concurrence Brennan Concurrence Marshall Concurrence Stewart, joined by Powell Concurrence Rehnquist Laws applied U.S. Const
Estelle_v._Smith
United States Supreme Court case
opinions Majority Kavanaugh, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Barrett Concurrence Sotomayor, joined by Kagan, Jackson Gorsuch took no part in the consideration
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County
Seven_County_Infrastructure_Coalition_v._Eagle_County
1984 United States Supreme Court case
opinions Majority Burger, joined by White, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor Concurrence O'Connor Dissent Brennan, joined by Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens Dissent
Lynch_v._Donnelly
Freedom of religion court case in the Philippines
against the petitioners are hereby annulled and set aside. Concurrence Isagani Cruz Concurrence Teodoro R. Padilla Camilo Quiason and Hugo Gutierrez Jr.
Ebralinag v. Division Superintendent
Ebralinag_v._Division_Superintendent
1991 United States Supreme Court case
joined by Marshall, Stevens, O'Connor (Parts IV, V) Concurrence Rehnquist, joined by Blackmun Concurrence Scalia Laws applied U.S. Const. amend. XIV
Connecticut_v._Doehr
1989 United States Supreme Court case
by Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy. O'Connor filed a concurrence, which was joined by Kennedy. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote an opinion
Michael_H._v._Gerald_D.
1993 United States Supreme Court case
opinions Majority Rehnquist, joined by Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas Concurrence Stevens Dissent White, joined by Blackmun; Souter (except the footnote
Brecht_v._Abrahamson
travel, tourism, insurance
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
travel, tourism, insurance